Index
Home
Vorige
I Want You (She's So Heavy)
Composer(s) : Lennon and McCartney
Year : 1969
Chords/Tabs: I Want You (She's So Heavy)
Notes on "I Want You (She's So Heavy)" IWYSSH
KEY d minor
METER 6/8 alternating with 4/4
FORM Intro -> Verse -> Verse -> Refrain ->
Verse (Instrumental) -> Refrain ->
Verse -> Outro (w/cutoff ending)
GENERAL POINTS OF INTEREST
Style and Form
- "I Want You (She's So Heavy)" is one of their most unusual experiments
with form, not to mention its characteristically odd phrase lengths and
changes of meter. It seems a shame that its equally unusual long running
time, abrupt ending, and especially its obsessively intense focus and over
the top Primal Screaming affect tend to upstage and eclipse the creative
novelty of the musical text.
- It's not quite a medley, rather more like two separate songs cinematically
cross cut with each other. One provides the verses, while the other provides
the intro, refrain, and extended outro.
- The "separateness" of the two elements derives from several points of
contrast:
Meter - 4/4 squared off jazzy back beat in the verses compared with slow
cranking ternary 6/8 for the rest.
Arrangement - Ensemble texture with lead vocal for the verses, compared
with focus on a bassline ostinato and accompanied by slow guitar arpeggios
(and cascaded backing vocals in the "refrain") for the rest.
Perspective of the lyrics - The verses directly address the love object,
while the refrain's reference her in the third person.
- The dramatic pauses between the sections and the uneven phrase lengths
within them recall several other of John's best work along the lines of
"Strawberry Fields ...,"
"Good Morning ...,"
"Happiness ...,"
and "Yer Blues."
- Just keep in mind, as I often remind you, that beneath all the novelty
there lies a heavy foundation deeply rooted in relatively traditional
hard blues.
Melody and Harmony
- Overall the song is securely rooted in the home key of d minor, in spite
of the unusual manner in which the verses all start off in the key of
a minor ("v") before converging towards home.
- The tune is predominantly in a pentatonic minor mode, encompassing scale
degrees 1-3-4-5-7. The alternate verse phrases though also make
effective use of the pungent flattened 5th and 7th; e.g. Ab and Cb
(not to be spelled B natural!) in the key of d.
- The verses are harmonically anchored around the chords i, VI, V, and
V-of-V, though there is also some uncharacteristically uncoordinated
harmony used to connect them.
Arrangement
- The arrangement and mood of the verse section is progressively intensified
from one appearance to the next, a development which meshes effectively with
the emergence of the always more intense intro/refrain section as the focal
point of the extended outro.
- The first verse opens in a halting declamatory style that belies the strict
tempo that actually marches through it. The next two verses have a demur,
slinking jazz beat of syncopated eighth notes. The guitar solo nicely
reinforces this mood in the way it understatedly paraphrases the original
tune instead of improvising upon it. In hindsight, you notice that the
lead guitar actually has been roughly doubling the lead vocal the whole
way through.
- The final verse is given a heavier treatment, with an increased role
for the lead guitar, and a literally screaming climax for the lead vocal;
the latter backed by a really mysterious bit of unintelligible studio chat
bleeding through.
- The refrains feature ornate riffing filigree in the right hand of
the organ part. The "SSH" demi title phrase that leads into it is
scanned differently against the meter in almost every case. In the
final iteration which introduces the outro, the final word "heavy" is
suspensefully dispensed with; the latter, a very clever, crafty detail.
SECTION-BY-SECTION WALKTHROUGH
Intro
- This brief 5 measure passage in 6/8 meter introduces us to
a phrase ultimately destined to dominate the track, but at this point
we're not supposed to know that; yet another kind of _Abbey Road_
foreshadwing gesture, this time within a single track!
|d |- |E9/7 |Bb7 |A aug. |
d: i V-of-V VI V
- The harmonic shape is open to yet another Augmented V chord; resonant
shades of the
"Oh! Darling"
intro. The odd 5 measure length combined
with the deferred resolution of V-of-V conspire to keep you off balance.
- All appearances of this phrase not followed by an immediate repeat of it
end with a grand pause on the final chord, almost as if the phrase were
closer to 6 measures instead of 5.
- From the opposite "unifying" perspective savor the subtle effect created
by have the pitch, f natural, sustained the whole way through the chord
changes as a common tone.
- The ground bass figure used here has a distinctive arch shape and
portentious melodic character reminiscent of the themes of some of JS
Bach's own pieces based ground basses such as the Passacaglia and Fugue
for organ in c, or the Chaconne for solo violin in d.
- The arpeggio figuration accompanying the bassline anticipates similar
passages in several side 2 songs on the album; e.g.
"Here Comes the Sun,"
"Because,"
and the coda of "You Never Give Me Your Money."
- The bassline makes a short downward chromatic move from C to Bb in
the second half of measure 3, a curious mirror image of a similar move
in the verse bassline.
Verse
- The verse is in 4/4 and has an overall clear structure of ABA'B', but
it parses into a series of strangely unequal phrase lengths, 8.5, 2, 8.5,
and 6:
|a |- |- |- |- |- |
a: i
**half measure
bass:A C |D F |G G#+|
|a C |G F |? E |
i III VII6/4 IV V
|a |A |
i I
d: V
|d |- |- |- |- |- |
i
**half measure
|d F |C Bb |g g# a |
i III VII VI ? ? ?
|E9 |- |- |- |- |- |
V-of-V
- The opening of this section in the key of A minor is an unsettling
harmonic surprise, given the intro's ending on such a fat, juicy V
chord to the key of d. It's not the smoothest or most convincing
transition, and your mind accepts it somewhat grudingly as "okay,
I guess" but "definitely not what I was expecting." On the other
hand, this all goes to make the resolution of that V chord to d minor
all the more gratifying when it's ultimately allowed to happen, like
whenever the outro phrase is doubled up as in the refrains.
- A Minor morphs into A Major at the end of this first phrase allowing
a seemingly inevitable ultimate arrival in the home key of d. The
second phrase runs roughly parallel to the first one and leads into
the third phrase which harmonically is very wide open on the V-of-V
chord.
- The chord progressions in the second half of both the first and second
"A" phrases are primarily driven by the bassline which ends in each case
with a small chromatic lick upward.
- For some reason these passages appear imprecisely performed on the
recording as if the players had a clear idea of where the phrases were
headed harmonically but each took a slightly different route toward the
common goal. I've labelled them out the best I can for now, but feel
like these couple of measures deserve a still closer look. In the
second verse, the ensemble actually sounds like it almost falls apart
at one point.
- Note the John Lennon signature details here of ending the "A" phrases
with a limping half measure, and the slow triplets filling that half
measure in the second "A" phrase.
- We find arpeggios again in this section, this time for the bass riffing
under the E9 chord at the end.
Refrain
- The refrains are formally "AA" doublings up of the intro phrase and
weigh in at 10 measures long.
Outro
- The outro consists of just short of 14 complete iterations in a row
of the intro with the final one cut short at the second eighth note
of the final measure. This presentation of a short riff in many
iterations is an idea that will reappear in more than one song on
side 2; e.g. again, the coda of
"... Your Money," the bridge between
"... Pam"
and "...Bathroom Window,"
and the series of guitar solos in "The End."
- The mood increases ever so slightly but surely over the course of
the section, primarily the results of uninhibited drumming and generally
noisy recording haze that emerge starting after the first several repeats.
- The particular placement of the cutoff reflects some uncanny compositional
knowledge and experience. Run all the alternative versions through in your
head and see for yourself. The official choice they made is at the sweet
spot between the two extremes of too obvious or too unsettling.
SOME FINAL THOUGHTS
- With the exception of
"Revolution 9" this very well may be the single
longest Beatles track in the canon. At 7:43 it is at least a half minute
longer than
"Hey Jude,"
with which it makes for an interesting contrast and
comparison, by the way.
- Both songs have extremely long outros that split the overall track
into two large sections that are in roughly "Golden Section" proportion
to each other.
- But whereas HJ reserves completely different material for the
*second* half and is also durationally weighted in its favor, the coda
material of IWYSSH is modally compatible with the rest of the song,
is exposed from the start, reiterated twice as a refrain within
the body of the song proper, and the overall track is durationally
weighted toward the *first* half. Without such front-end ballast the
overall track would badly suffer from overexposure of the intro phrase.
I expect there are "enemies" of this song who claim the latter problem
exists with the track even as it now stands.
- The two songs make very different dramatic use of their extended outros,
with
HJ
fading out very gradually to a complete vanishing point, and IWYSSH
maintaining and even increasing its intensity as it unfolds. This
difference directly reflects a contrast at the very core of the two songs.
- You might say that both songs suggest the feeling of asymptotically
approaching the limit of a particular emotional experience or state of mind.
In the case of HJ
, the intimation of sublime transcendence is both aptly
captured by the fadeout to silence and can be contemplated in physical and
aesthetic comfort.
- In the case of IWYSSH, the intimation of an obsession upon which the mind
zooms in on irresistably, way past the point of comfort, very likely toward
a breaking point or beyond, aesthetically defies a successful literal
musical treatment. A drawn out and extreme crescendo might be apt but it
sure won't be "pretty." The alternative abrupt cutoff works better on
the level of less-is-more. In some ways that cutoff more strongly suggests
an after hours, offstage moment of crash and burn than any attempt that
could have been made to perform it explicitly as part of the album track.
Regards,
Alan (awp@world.std.com)
---
"I wasn't born to lose you." 112699#182
---
Copyright (c) 1999 by Alan W. Pollack
All Rights Reserved
This article may be reproduced, retransmitted, redistributed and
otherwise propagated at will, provided that this notice remains
intact and in place.
Ook op Abbey Road:
(c) 2024 Serge Girard